ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of SGLT2 Inhibitors for Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disease Based on Data from Japanese Studies.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Other Novel Nephroprotective Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiac impact of dapagliflozin in advanced chronic kidney disease: rationale and design of the Renal Lifecycle Trial cardiac imaging sub-studies.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular, renal, and metabolic diseases, collectively known as cardio-renal-metabolic (CRM) disease, interact and exacerbate each other, creating serious clinical and economic burdens. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are important therapeutic agents in managing CRM disease. Despite proven clinical benefits, the economic benefits of SGLT2i in the management of CRM diseases remain unclear.
methodsWe developed Markov models representing the natural progression of disease for two populations: a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) population and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (non-DM CKD) population. These models incorporated key complications, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, CKD (for the T2DM population), and end-stage renal disease. A systematic literature search was conducted to determine input parameters. For each model, we estimated the 10-year medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for SGLT2i treatment compared with conventional treatment. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario analyses with conservative assumptions were performed.
resultsIn the base-case analysis, SGLT2i treatment was estimated to increase QALY by 0.177 (7.090 vs 6.913 QALY; T2DM population) and 0.457 (6.980 vs 6.523 QALY; non-DM CKD population), and increase total medical costs by Japanese yen (JPY) 99,060 (JPY 762,524 vs 663,463; T2DM population) and JPY 229,810 (JPY 3,378,873 vs 3,149,063; non-DM CKD population), compared with conventional treatment. The ICER was JPY 559,175/QALY in the T2DM population and JPY 503,123/QALY in the non-DM CKD population. The PSA revealed that the probability of ICER being below the threshold value of JPY 5,000,000/QALY was 100% in the T2DM population and 98.7% in the non-DM CKD population, and the ICERs were below this threshold in all scenario analyses.
conclusionSGLT2i treatment was demonstrated to be cost-effective in both the T2DM population and the non-DM CKD population, suggesting the potential of SGLT2i to offer significant clinical and economic benefits in the comprehensive management of CRM diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.