ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Benchmarking reinforcement learning algorithms for autonomous mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-Assisted Mechanical Thrombectomy for Neurointerventional Surgery: An Exploratory Scoping Review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard for treating acute ischemic stroke. However, challenges such as operator radiation exposure, reliance on operator experience, and limited treatment access remain. Although autonomous robotics could mitigate some of these limitations, current research lacks benchmarking of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for MT. This study aims to evaluate the performance of Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient, Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient, Soft Actor-Critic, and Proximal Policy Optimization for MT.
methodsSimulated endovascular interventions based on the open-source stEVE platform were employed to train and evaluate RL algorithms. We simulated navigation of a guidewire from the descending aorta to the supra-aortic arteries, a key phase in MT. The impact of tuning hyperparameters, such as learning rate and network size, was explored. Optimized hyperparameters were used for assessment on an MT benchmark.
resultsBefore tuning, Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient had the highest success rate at 80% with a procedure time of 6.87 s when navigating to the supra-aortic arteries. After tuning, Proximal Policy Optimization achieved the highest success rate at 84% with a procedure time of 5.08 s. On the MT benchmark, Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient recorded the highest success rate at 68% with a procedure time of 214.05 s.
conclusionThis work advances autonomous endovascular navigation by establishing a benchmark for MT. The results emphasize the importance of hyperparameter tuning on the performance of RL algorithms. Future research should extend this benchmark to identify the most effective RL algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.