ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Comparison of Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop with NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II to diagnose color-vision deficiency.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the degree of agreement between the results of the Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop (HMC) and NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II (OT-II). STUDY
designRetrospective.
methodsThe study included 53 patients who underwent color-vision testing at Kariya Toyota General Hospital between March 2019 and April 2022. The participants included 2 patients with normal color vision, 10 with protanopia, 3 with protanomaly, 22 with deuteranopia, and 16 with deuteranomaly. Color-vision testing was performed using the Ishihara Test for Colour Deficiency, Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates Part 1, Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness Panel-15, HMC, and OT-II. An agreement was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values of the equal values obtained from HMC and OT-II were examined.
resultsThe ICCs between the results of HMC and OT-II were 0.979, 0.979, and 0.985, for the minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and 0.943, 0.755, and 0.919 for the yellow monochromatic values, respectively (p < 0.0001 in all). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the differences were mostly within the limits of agreement. Fixed errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and minimum yellow monochromatic values. Proportional errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values.
conclusionsHMC and OT-II showed high agreement for all values in the ICC and Bland-Altman analyses. In the Bland-Altman analysis, systemic errors were observed in the maximum red-green mixture value and the minimum and maximum yellow monochromatic values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.