ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the haematological malignancy patient-reported outcome measure (HM-PRO).
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- From symptom scales to regulatory endpoints: the evolution and clinical impact of patient-reported outcome measures in myeloproliferative neoplasms.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Hematological malignancies.HemaSphere · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessment of cancer patients´ quality of life (QoL) through patient-reported outcomes (PRO) during and after treatment is gaining ground. The HM-PRO is the first generic Haematological Malignancy specific PRO measure for use in clinical practice and clinical trials. Such generic tools are needed in Denmark. The study aim was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HM-PRO into Danish and evaluate the psychometric properties.
methodsTranslation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English HM-PRO into Danish followed established guidelines. After cognitive debriefing interviews, it underwent psychometric testing with a variety of hematologic malignancies. Construct validity, internal consistency, dimensionality, item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning were investigated.
results295 patients were included for psychometric evaluation; confirmatory factor and bifactor analyses for both HM-PRO parts provided good evidence to support the suggested factor structure (Cronbach's-α Part-A = 0.81, Part-B = 0.84; Part-A CFA CFI = 0.922, TLI = 0.912; bi-factor CFI = 0.989, TLI = 0.978). IRT showed good item-fit and factor loadings and absence of local dependency.
conclusionThe HM-PRO has demonstrated favourable psychometric properties and can be used broadly within the Danish Healthcare system to monitor symptoms as well as QoL impact of patients with haematological cancer and optimize patient engagement during routine cancer care. WHAT IS THE NEW ASPECT OF YOUR WORK?: In response to the intention of the Danish Health Authority to systematically collect PRO data on health-related QoL in Danish cancer patients, this study investigates the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English HM-PRO into Danish. WHAT IS THE CENTRAL FINDING OF YOUR WORK?: Few issues were met with the translation and adaptation of HM-PRO into Danish. WHAT IS (OR COULD BE) THE SPECIFIC CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF YOUR WORK?: The HM-PRO has demonstrated favourable psychometric properties and can be used broadly within the Danish Healthcare system to monitor symptoms as well as QoL impact of patients with haematological cancer and optimize patient engagement during routine cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.