ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
The current status and future perspective of extended anticoagulation therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Anticoagulation Therapy With Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism According to Different Performance Status Scores: Insights From the ONCO PE Randomized Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of important complications in cancer patients, with implications for morbidity, mortality, recurrent VTE, bleeding events, and quality of life. Extended anticoagulation therapy beyond 3-6 months of mandatory duration of anticoagulation therapy following an episode of VTE has been an unsolved issue in the management of patients with VTE. The current guidelines recommend extended anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer-associated VTE because these patients could be at a high risk of recurrent VTE. However, patients with cancer-associated VTE are also at a high risk of bleeding events with anticoagulation therapy, which provoking dilemma taking a good balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk with extended anticoagulation therapy in the daily clinical practice. Thus, whether to extend anticoagulation therapy, which anticoagulants to use, what dosages of anticoagulants to take, and how long to extend the duration of anticoagulation therapy have been still a matter of active debate in these patients. So far, several studies including randomized clinical trials (RCT) have provided several insights into the optimal duration and dosage of extended anticoagulation therapy. Although recent RCTs significantly progress the understanding of extended anticoagulation therapy for cancer-associated VTE, there has been still a number of unmet needs in these patients. In the future perspective, a personalized approach that takes into account multiple factors could be needed for the optimal implementation of extended anticoagulation therapy in an individual patient with cancer-associated VTE. The current review overviews the current status and future perspective of extended anticoagulation therapy for cancer-associated VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40299165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.