ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Predicting Visual Acuity after Retinal Vein Occlusion Anti-VEGF Treatment: Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the role of oxidative stress in retinal vein occlusion: an updated and comprehensive review on the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives.International ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Intensive Care Units Mortality and Length of Stay: A 11-Year Retrospective Study in Hong Kong Public Hospitals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning to predict functional visual outcomes after the anti-VEGF loading phase for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: model development and temporal internal validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Fast and accurate visual acuity prediction based on optical aberrations and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integration of peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices and retinal imaging using interpretable machine learning for predicting anti-VEGF treatment response in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of post-treatment visual acuity in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) is critical for optimizing anti-VEGF therapy and improving clinical outcomes. While machine learning (ML) has shown promise in ophthalmic prognostication, existing models often lack interpretability and clinical applicability for RVO management. This study developed and validated an interpretable ML model to predict visual acuity changes in RVO patients following anti-VEGF treatment. Using retrospective data from 259 RVO patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, we identified key predictive features through the Boruta algorithm and evaluated eight ML algorithms. The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model emerged as optimal, achieving an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96) in the testing cohort with 0.83 accuracy, 0.88 sensitivity, 0.73 specificity, 0.87 F1 score, and 0.14 Brier score. Critical predictors included baseline visual acuity, systolic blood pressure (SBP), age, diabetic retinal inner layer dysfunction (DRIL), and disease subtype. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed baseline visual acuity as the most influential prognostic factor, followed by SBP and age. Our model seeks to bridge the critical gaps in current research: (1) systematically comparing the applicability and effects of different ML algorithms in RVO-ME visual acuity prediction, and (2) inherent interpretability through SHAP value visualization. The combination of high predictive performance (AUC > 0.9) with inherent clinical transparency may enable the practical implementation of this tool in guiding anti-VEGF treatment decisions. Future validation in multicenter cohorts could further strengthen its generalizability for personalized RVO management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40299116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.