Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299116›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Predicting Visual Acuity after Retinal Vein Occlusion Anti-VEGF Treatment: Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model.

Chunlan Liang, Lian Liu, Tianqi Zhao, Weiyun Ouyang, Guocheng Yu, Jun Lyu, Jingxiang Zhong

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chunlan LiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Lian LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Tianqi ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Weiyun OuyangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Guocheng YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China.
Jun LyuDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China. lyujun2020@jnu.edu.cn.
Jingxiang ZhongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 Huangpu Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, China. zjx85221206@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271094Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 202201020015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of post-treatment visual acuity in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) is critical for optimizing anti-VEGF therapy and improving clinical outcomes. While machine learning (ML) has shown promise in ophthalmic prognostication, existing models often lack interpretability and clinical applicability for RVO management. This study developed and validated an interpretable ML model to predict visual acuity changes in RVO patients following anti-VEGF treatment. Using retrospective data from 259 RVO patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, we identified key predictive features through the Boruta algorithm and evaluated eight ML algorithms. The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model emerged as optimal, achieving an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96) in the testing cohort with 0.83 accuracy, 0.88 sensitivity, 0.73 specificity, 0.87 F1 score, and 0.14 Brier score. Critical predictors included baseline visual acuity, systolic blood pressure (SBP), age, diabetic retinal inner layer dysfunction (DRIL), and disease subtype. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed baseline visual acuity as the most influential prognostic factor, followed by SBP and age. Our model seeks to bridge the critical gaps in current research: (1) systematically comparing the applicability and effects of different ML algorithms in RVO-ME visual acuity prediction, and (2) inherent interpretability through SHAP value visualization. The combination of high predictive performance (AUC > 0.9) with inherent clinical transparency may enable the practical implementation of this tool in guiding anti-VEGF treatment decisions. Future validation in multicenter cohorts could further strengthen its generalizability for personalized RVO management.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsMachine LearningMacular EdemaRetinal Vein OcclusionVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFExtreme Gradient BoostingInterpretable machine learningRetinal vein occlusionVisual acuity prediction

Identifiers

PMID40299116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.