Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299088›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

From pixels to prognosis: leveraging radiomics and machine learning to predict IDH1 genotype in gliomas.

Asli Beril Karakas, Figen Govsa, Mehmet Asim Ozer, Huseyin Biceroglu, Cenk Eraslan, Deniz Tanir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asli Beril KarakasDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, 37200, Turkey. asliberilkarakas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-6489
Figen GovsaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-6308
Mehmet Asim OzerDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-6694
Huseyin BicerogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-0826
Cenk EraslanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5762-6149
Deniz TanirDepartment of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-6625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system, and advances in genetics and molecular medicine have significantly transformed their classification and treatment. This study aims to predict the IDH1 genotype in gliomas using radiomics and machine learning (ML) methods. Retrospective data from 108 glioma patients were analyzed, including MRI data supported by demographic details such as age, sex, and comorbidities. Tumor segmentation was manually performed using 3D Slicer software, and 112 radiomic features were extracted with the PyRadiomics library. Feature selection using the mRMR algorithm identified 17 significant radiomic features. Various ML algorithms, including KNN, Ensemble, DT, LR, Discriminant and SVM, were applied to predict the IDH1 genotype. The KNN and Ensemble models achieved the highest sensitivity (92-100%) and specificity (100%), emerging as the most successful models. Comparative analyses demonstrated that KNN achieved an accuracy of 92.59%, sensitivity of 92.38%, specificity of 100%, precision of 100%, and an F1-score of 95.02%. Similarly, the Ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 90.74%, sensitivity of 90.65%, specificity of 100%, precision of 100%, and an F1-score of 95.13%. To evaluate their effectiveness, KNN and Ensemble models were compared with commonly used machine learning approaches in glioma classification. LR, a conventional statistical approach, exhibited lower predictive performance with an accuracy of 79.63%, while SVM, a frequently utilized ML model for radiomics-based tumor classification, achieved an accuracy of 85.19%. Our findings are consistent with previous research indicating that radiomics-based ML models achieve high accuracy in IDH1 mutation prediction, with reported performances typically exceeding 80%. These findings suggest that KNN and Ensemble models are more effective in capturing the non-linear radiomic patterns associated with IDH1 status, compared to traditional ML approaches. Our findings indicate that radiomic analyses provide comprehensive genotypic classification by assessing the entire tumor and present a safer, faster, and more patient-friendly alternative to traditional biopsies. This study highlights the potential of radiomics and ML techniques, particularly KNN, Ensemble, and SVM, as powerful tools for predicting the molecular characteristics of gliomas and developing personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleGenotypeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGliomaIDH1K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN)Machine learning (ML)Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)RadiomicsSupport Vector Machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID40299088
PMCPMC12040993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.