ArticleCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2026
Dengue: Historical Aspects.
Article in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of different intervention measures for a dengue outbreak in Hangzhou based on a dynamic model.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To write about dengue retrospective epidemiology is a challenging subject because until laboratory diagnosis tests were developed to confirm human infections by dengue virus (DENV) between 1940 and 1950, all reports about disease or epidemics referred to a generic "dengue/break bone fever/contagious fever/bilious remitting fever." These nomenclatures employed in past times had perspectives based on medical reports, letters and diaries of people living in the affected areas at the time, and local newspaper reports. As Packard (Bull Hist Med 90(2):193-221) highlighted, the difficulty of using historical sources and "the ambiguous nature" of eighteenth-century disease categories turns the analysis puzzling. Nevertheless, if judiciously used, it can illuminate the history of dengue epidemics over time.In this chapter, we will focus on three periods that were pivotal to shaping our current understanding of dengue disease and epidemiology: (1) First reports of a dengue-like disease and the impact of the infection during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; (2) The impact of the II World War (II WW) on the spread of the DENV and its vector worldwide; and (3) The re-introduction of dengue in the Americas and the challenge of Public Health services to control the dramatic escalation of cases and the introduction of new serotypes/genotypes. It is worth mentioning that in the last years, South and Central America and Caribe account for more than 80% of dengue cases in the world (PAHO).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40299029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.