ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2025
Fake smoke, real fire: a retrospective single-center analysis of the underestimated risk of e-cigarette explosions and the typical burn patterns.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Fake smoke, real fire: a retrospective single-center analysis of the underestimated risk of e-cigarette explosions and the typical burn patterns".Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parallel to the increasing dissemination of electronic cigarettes (E-cigarette) in the population, increasing numbers of burn injuries caused by explosions of the devices or the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries have been observed worldwide. Several cases of E‑cigarette-related explosions have already resulted in fatalities. We report a series of 7 patients who were treated at our department between 2016 and 2022. Of the seven patients two required treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU), two further patients required normal ward and three patients could be treated as outpatients. The median age of the patients was 43 years and the female to male ratio 2:5. Most of the patients had superficial to full thickness burn injuries on their thighs and (dominant) hands; however, injuries to the genitals were also observed. The patients' burns had a median total body surface area of 4.5%. Of these patients 4 had to stay in hospital for a median of 12.5 days, 2 of them required surgical treatment and intensive care. No patient died during hospitalization. Explosions of E‑cigarettes often happen in public while the devices or rechargeable lithium-ion batteries are being carried in trouser pockets, as shown in our study. This often ignites the victim's clothing. In a crowd or on public transport, this fire could spread quickly and endanger surrounding persons. It is therefore in the public interest to raise awareness of this potential danger from E‑cigarettes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.