ReviewAnnals of plastic surgery2025
Robotic-Assisted Lymphatic Supermicrosurgery for Breast Lymphedema-A Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in Annals of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robotic applications in plastic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Treatment of Breast Lymphedema Following Delayed Autologous Reconstruction: A Case Report.Microsurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBreast lymphedema, an often-overlooked complication of breast cancer treatment, affects nearly half of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery and responds poorly to conservative measures. While lymphaticovenous bypass (LVB) is a well-established intervention for extremity lymphedema, its application in breast lymphedema has been sporadic. We utilized microsurgical robot system in 1 patient to overcome the technical challenges of performing LVB in the breast.A 42-year-old woman developed progressive right breast swelling, heaviness, and pain following lumpectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Conservative measures failed to provide relief. Indocyanine green lymphography (ICGL) revealed normal lymphatic drainage in the arm but dermal backflow in the central and lower breast. Linear patterns in the upper outer quadrant, terminating near the axillary scar, were marked. Using a microsurgical robotic system, 2 end-to-end LVBs were performed through a single skin incision. Immediate postoperative decongestion was observed, with sustained symptomatic improvement at 6 months, evidenced by reduced pain scores and a significant decrease in the Lymphedema Life Impact Score. A literature review identified 6 reports describing 7 cases of LVB for breast lymphedema. The number of bypasses per breast ranged from 1 to 6, with 1 or 2 skin incisions, predominantly in the upper outer quadrant. All cases reported prompt subjective symptom relief, though objective measures were inconsistently applied.Our case demonstrates the first successful application of robotic-assisted LVB for breast lymphedema with significant improvement in clinical signs and symptoms as well as quality of life, based on validated patient-reported outcomes. Robotic assistance enhanced both the feasibility and ergonomics of performing supermicrosurgical LVB in the anatomically complex breast region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.