ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Production and Role of Free Radicals and Reactive Oxygen Species After Facial Nerve Injury.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Black phosphorus nanosheet-enabled ROS-adaptive core-shell microneedles orchestrate immunoredox remodeling and neurotrophic regeneration for facial nerve repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Role of maslinic acid in ischemia-reperfusion-induced testicular injury in rats.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Plant protein-phenolic acids as novel food-grade synergistic modulators of neuronal function: A review.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Neuroprotective mechanisms of Buyang Huanwu decoction in ischemic stroke.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- The role of antioxidants in facial nerve injury.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facial nerve injury (FNI) induces complex molecular and cellular responses, with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals (FRs) playing pivotal roles in nerve degeneration and regeneration. However, to date, no systematic review has specifically investigated the involvement of ROS and FRs in FNI. To address this unmet need, we reviewed the literature on the subject, comprehensively searching SCOPUS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify studies that assessed the roles of FRs and ROS in FNI and summarize their findings. A total of 15 studies that satisfied search criteria were identified. Key findings showed that excessive ROS and FR lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and ferroptosis, exacerbating nerve degeneration after facial nerve injury. These effects are modulated by antioxidants, including alpha-lipoic acid, edaravone, N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), glutathione peroxidase 4, glutathione, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, Si-based agents, superoxide dismutase, and tirilazad mesylate. The insights gained from this review suggest that levels of FRs and ROS are strongly associated with the pathophysiology of facial nerve injury and underscore the therapeutic potential of targeting ROS and FR pathways in facial nerve injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.