ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Clinical validation of terminological subsets of the international classification for nursing practice: a scoping review.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposal of a method for clinical validation of ICNP® terminological subsets in hospital practice.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Specialized nursing terminology in pre-exposure prophylaxis: alexical analysis.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of ICNP® Terminological Subset for people with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of the terminology subset for newborns with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Intensive Care.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- Method for analyzing the clinical applicability of a terminology subset in primary health care: theoretical study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto map the scientific evidence on the clinical validation of terminological subsets of the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®).
methodsa scoping review was conducted between January and February 2024 across nine databases. The review adhered to the guidelines established by the JBI and followed the checklist for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Data analysis was performed using simple descriptive statistics and lexical analysis with IRaMuTeQ software.
resultsfifteen studies were selected, with the majority conducted in Brazil (93.3%). Seven were master's dissertations (46.7%); 86.7% focused on adult and elderly health, while 13.3% addressed maternal and child health. Eight studies were conducted at the Federal University of Paraíba (53.3%), and ten works adopted case study designs (66.7%).
conclusionsthere is a lack of progress, as the studies are in their early stages and require greater methodological consistency and broader availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.