ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Medical harm reduction practices related to unsafe abortion in primary health care in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: contexts and barriers to implementation].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Brazilian physicians regarding abortion care: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Few rights, great threats, endless struggles: setbacks and resistance in the last decade of fights for legal abortion in Brazil.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- "They're not used to people asking what they need": work processes and care practices in feminist abortion accompaniment - a qualitative study.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unsafe induced abortion is a public health problem responsible for high morbidity and mortality during the pregnancy and postpartum period. In view of the State's negligence in addressing this problem, various preventive strategies have been proposed. One of them involves healthcare professionals working to reduce the risks of unsafe abortion. The aim of this study was to identify primary healthcare physicians in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, who embrace this perspective, and to understand the challenges they face in providing such care. It is a qualitative research with a hermeneutic-dialectical approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with eight professionals. The results show that this work faces many obstacles, including fear of stigma and moral judgement, the growth of conservatism in the country, and the limitations of public health policies, whose maternal and infant orientation guides care practices in the pregnancy-postpartum cycle. As a targeted public policy, harm reduction strategies require political commitment, continuous education, targets and metrics to comprehensively address individual needs and reduce mortality due to unsafe abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.