ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Educational strategy for prevention of cervical cancer in Indigenous peoples: a participatory action research experience].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practices on cervical cancer after an educational intervention in the framework of participatory action research with Indigenous peoples of the El Paujil reservation, Guainía, Colombia. A diagnosis was made with an intercultural and participatory approach. Subsequently, the educational strategy was designed and implemented. Community leaders actively participated in the research during all stages. The strategy was evaluated via a survey on knowledge, attitudes, and practices about cervical cancer. The effects were determined by comparing pre- and post-intervention questionnaires with the Mann-Whitney and chi-squared tests. Overall, 957 women participated in the educational strategy. The level of knowledge about cervical cancer significantly improved, increasing from 8.5% to 12.5%, before and after the intervention (p < 0.001), respectively. The percentage of Pap smear testing also increased, from 64.4% to 73.9% (p = 0.0467). However, the limited knowledge about the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, and about risk factors such as multiparity or early initiation of sexual intercourse remained the same. After the intervention, a significant increase in the knowledge of women with low educational level was found. Health education with an intercultural approach within the participatory action research framework is effective in improving knowledge and practices for the prevention of cervical cancer in vulnerable communities. However, for optimal results, it is important to hold long-term projects in order to build trust relationships with the communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.