Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40298642›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Oxidative Stress of Human Sperm Cryopreservation.

Steven D Fleming, Laura K Thomson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Comparative Evaluation of TriladylVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Inefficacy ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Protective Effect ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven D FlemingDiscipline of Anatomy & Histology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6242-8083
Laura K ThomsonSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their negligible cytoplasm and composition of the sperm plasmalemma, spermatozoa are particularly vulnerable to lipid peroxidative damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Most ROS are referred to as free radicals because they have unpaired electrons, causing them to scavenge electrons from atoms within tissues, resulting in oxidative damage to cellular components including cell membranes, intracellular organelles, and DNA. The potential consequences of oxidative stress include impaired sperm function, DNA fragmentation, and apoptosis. Understanding the mechanisms that mediate sperm damage during cryopreservation is key to the development of improved sperm freezing media formulations and methodology to mitigate its occurrence. Historically, elucidation of those mechanisms has proven largely elusive and is complicated by the positive role that ROS also play as messengers in redox signaling and the different pathways that mediate sperm DNA damage and apoptosis. More recently, oxidative stress has been revealed as the most likely suspect in cryopreservation-induced sperm DNA damage. This narrative review was intended to provide an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms involved and offer insight into possible improvements in sperm cryopreservation.

Indexed as

cryopreservationspermatozoasperm cryopreservationsperm DNA fragmentationsperm plasmalemmavitrification

Identifiers

PMID40298642
PMCPMC12024095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.