ArticleCancer immunology research2025
CAR Binders Affect CAR T-cell Tonic Signaling, Durability, and Sensitivity to Target.
Article in Cancer immunology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation natural killer cell therapy: bench to bedside and beyond.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Development andFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The trinity of T cell engagement: navigating the molecular and clinical landscape of CAR-T, TILs, and TCEs in the war against cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Optimal pairing of binder and co-stimulatory domains improves dual CART cell efficacy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients can develop human anti-mouse immune responses against CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells due to the use of a murine CD19-specific single-chain variable fragment to redirect T cells. We screened a yeast display library to identify an array of fully human CD19 single-chain variable fragment binders and performed a series of studies to select the most promising fully human CAR. We observed significant differences in the ability of CARs employing these CD19 binders to be expressed on the cell surface, induce tonic signaling, redirect T-cell function, mediate tumor killing, recognize lower levels of CD19 antigen, and maintain function upon continuous antigen exposure. From this initial analysis, CAR T cells using two binders (42 and 52) were selected for additional studies. Although CAR T cells using both binders controlled tumor growth well in vivo, we advanced a CAR construct using binder 42 for more advanced preclinical testing because of its greater similarity to binders based on the antibody FMC63, which is the murine antibody underlying four FDA-approved CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapies, and ability to robustly respond to tumors expressing lower levels of CD19. We found that this binder uniquely bound CD19 using distinct contact residues than FMC63 and with ∼40-fold lower affinity. CARs using binder 42 were non-inferior to those using the FMC63 binder in a mouse model of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, indicating that CAR T cells using binder 42 should be considered for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.