Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2025
A Phase II Trial of Geriatric Assessment-Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With AML.
Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Study of the Impact of Clinicogenetic Risk-Stratified Management on Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients
Geriatric Assessment-Guided Treatment Selection in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (The ALIGN-AML Trial)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients: An Updated Canadian Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Evolving Management Approaches Toward Personalized Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) scale does not effectively identify elderly AML patients suitable for intensive induction chemotherapy - a multicenter study from Polish Adult Leukemia Group.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Care of Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Role of Geriatric Assessment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Moving beyond the eyeball test for fitness assessment in AML.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in unfit patients: 2026 treatment algorithms.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How to select the appropriate intensity of chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains an unanswered question. In a phase II trial of older adults ≥ 60 years with AML (n = 73), we used geriatric assessment (measures of comorbidity burden, physical and cognitive function) to determine fitness for intensive chemotherapy. We integrated the geriatric assessment and genetic test results to personalize the selection of chemotherapy intensity with a goal to reduce early mortality (NCT03226418). Broad eligibility criteria allowed enrolling patients representative of those treated in real-world practices: 45% of patients were ≥ 70 years, 57% had ≥ 2 comorbidities, 27% had a history of solid malignancies, and 74% had impairments in ≥ 2 geriatric assessment domains used to assign treatment intensity. Thirty-two percent of patients resided in rural areas, and 45% were comanaged with community oncologists. The median time from enrollment to therapy initiation was 1 day (range 0-13). Eight patients (11%) received intensive chemotherapy; others received low-intensity chemotherapy. Mortality at 30 days from diagnosis was 6.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 3.0%-15.1%) and at 90 days was 21.9% (95% CI 14.0%-32.7%). One-year survival was 45.9% (95% CI 35.6%-59.3%). Our study demonstrates that pre-treatment geriatric assessment in older adults with AML is feasible, can identify several functional impairments, and guide the selection of treatment intensity. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm the survival benefit of this approach over the traditional approach of treatment selection. Trial Registration: NCT03226418.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.