Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40298262›Full record

ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025

Adult Vulval Psoriasis: Clinical Presentation, Management and Impact on Quality of Life.

Michelle Wu, Gayle Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle WuFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2013-1860
Gayle FischerFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesTo explore the clinical presentation, management and impact on quality of life in women with vulval psoriasis.

methodsA retrospective, single-centre cohort study of women was conducted at a large dermatology practice from January 2016 to January 2024. Sequential Vulval Quality of Life Index scores and patient data were systematically collected and recorded in an online patient database. Treatment regimens were individualised and titrated to clinical response.

resultsThe study included a total of 350 patients with vulval psoriasis over an eight-year period. 13.1% of patients required systemic treatment solely for vulval disease. The median VQLI score improved from 18.0 ± 9.4 at baseline to 9.7 ± 7.6 at the end of follow-up (p < 0.0001). All domains showed statistically significant improvements except for 'Sexual Function'. The domains with the greatest improvement were 'Future Health Concerns' (69.2%, p < 0.001), 'Feelings and Emotions' (63.4%, p < 0.001) 'Symptoms' (58.6%, p < 0.001) and 'Activities of Daily Living' (56.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Vulval psoriasis has a substantial impact on quality of life but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. While treatment can significantly improve outcomes, issues related to sexual function and relationships often persist. Systemic therapy may be required for a subset of patients with vulval-only disease. Routine assessment and targeted management of vulval involvement are crucial to optimising patient well-being.

Indexed as

PsoriasisQuality of LifeVulvar DiseasesActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesgenital psoriasispsoriasisquality of lifevulvalvulval psoriasis

Identifiers

PMID40298262
PMCPMC12145728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.