Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40298101›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2025

Effect of a Vaccine Mandate in Nonessential Public Spaces in New Orleans, Louisiana, on COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, 2021-2022.

Aneeka Ratnayake, Charles Stoecker, Patricia J Kissinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aneeka RatnayakeTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8955-8665
Charles StoeckerTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Patricia J KissingerTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2038-9151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDuring the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine hesitancy in the United States was a key driver of continued COVID-19 transmission and the emergence of new variants. We examined the effect of a mandate that required patrons at nonessential venues (eg, restaurants, bars) in New Orleans, Louisiana, to be vaccinated to enter these establishments from August 2021 through March 2022.

methodsWe implemented a parish-level synthetic control model that compared vaccination trends in Orleans Parish (county) (the boundaries of Orleans Parish are equivalent to the city of New Orleans) with a synthetic composite of other parishes in Louisiana that had similar vaccination trends before the mandate. We used permutation testing (ie, shuffle testing) to determine the significance of differences in vaccination rates between Orleans Parish and other parishes.

resultsIndividuals in Orleans Parish initiated an average of 760 more vaccines weekly during the 31 weeks in which the mandate was in place, which was significantly higher than expected based on the synthetic control (

conclusionsThe rate of vaccine initiation increased during the vaccine mandate for nonessential venues. Implementing such mandates may be an effective intervention in overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy during a future pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19mandatesvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40298101
PMCPMC12040849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.