ArticleNoise & health
Effects of Five-Element Music-Based Psychological Intervention Combined with Respiratory Specialty Care on Negative Emotions and Lung Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of music-guided breathing training combined with singing on pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comorbid depression and autonomic dysfunction reduce lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to explore the effects of five-element music-based psychological intervention combined with respiratory specialty care on negative emotions and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 170 COPD patients admitted to Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital) from February 2022 to February 2023. The patients were divided into three groups in accordance with nursing care methods. The control group (n = 55) received conventional nursing care, group A (n = 58) received respiratory specialty care and group B (n = 57) received five-element music-based psychological intervention combined with respiratory specialty care. Nursing effectiveness was evaluated 6 months after discharge. Medical compliance, inflammatory indicators, lung function indicators [vital capacity (VC), peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)], 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, negative emotions, and quality of life were compared among the three groups.
resultsGroups A and B received higher scores in medical compliance and had higher VC, PEF, and FEV1/FVC levels than the control group (P < 0.05). The serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin levels in groups A and B were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, their 6MWT distance was longer than that of the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in inflammatory indicators, lung function indicators, and 6MWT distance between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The scores of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Hamilton Depression Scale, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in group B were lower than those in group A and the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionFive-element music-based psychological intervention combined with respiratory specialty care can significantly alleviate negative emotions in COPD patients and improve their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.