ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
Development for the Teen-Aged Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (TA-LIBRE12-19) Profile.
Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in clinical burn management have led to emphasis on using assessments in clinics. Outcome measures are important to assess the effectiveness of interventions, and support integration back into the community. A more granular measure with advanced psychometrics capability using Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is needed. The current study developed a conceptual model as the first step in creating a new measurement tool for teen burn survivors aged 12-19 years, inclusively. To identify outcomes important in assessment of burn recovery, focus groups of clinicians, teens, and their parents were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Each focus group transcript was analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches to identify and categorize content. Findings were used to validate the model and ensure adequate domain coverage. The Teen-Aged Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (TA-LIBRE12-19) conceptual model includes Activity (Mobility, Physical Self-care, General Tasks, Experience of Self, and Learning and Applying Knowledge) and Participation (Major Life Areas, Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships, and Engagement). Eighteen participants completed the study. Clinician's median age was 47 years (90% female and 80% White); teens' median age was 14 years (62% female and 75% White). Burn size ranged from 0.25% to 60% TBSA. Focus group content was coded a total of 1,138 times during the analysis. Outcome areas most impacted include Experience of Self, Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships, and Symptoms (372, 282, and 112 codes, respectively). A well-informed credible conceptual model was developed with a solid foundation of domains consisting of Activity and Participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.