Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297991›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Evaluating the Involvement of People With Cancer and Informal Caregivers in the Development Process of a New Set of Quality of Life Questionnaires.

Merel Engelaar, Femke van Schelven, Nanne Bos, Marion L'Hote, Clémentine Rialland, Norbert Couespel, Carina Dantas, Caitriona Higgins, Tapani Kalmi, Inke Minnée-van Braak and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Merel EngelaarNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-6302-1171
Femke van SchelvenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-5025
Nanne BosNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marion L'HoteEuropean Cancer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Clémentine RiallandEuropean Cancer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Norbert CouespelEuropean Cancer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium.
Carina DantasSHINE 2Europe Lda, Coimbra, Portugal.
Caitriona HigginsBeaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Tapani KalmiIndependent co-researcher, Turku, Finland.
Inke Minnée-van BraakIndependent co-researcher, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Laura PinnavaiaDepartment of Languages, Literatures, Cultures and Mediations, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni ApoloneScientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia BrunelliPalliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Augusto CaraceniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Department of Excellence 2023-2027, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Montse FerrerHospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Mogens GroenvoldBispebjerg/Frederiksberg Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stein KaasaOslo Universitetssykehus HF, Oslo, Norway.
Gennaro CilibertoIRCCS National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
Claudio LombardoOrganisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.
Ricardo PietrobonSporeData OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia.
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Aude SirvenUnicancer, Paris, France.
Hugo VachonQuality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Galina VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jany RademakersNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

The wider research project, 'Quality of Life in Oncology: Measuring What Matters for Cancer Patients and Survivors in Europe' (EUonQoL), in which these Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) activities are embedded, has received funding from the European Union's Research and Innovation Programme HORIZON-MISS-2021-CANCER-02 under Grant Agreement No. 101096362 Project EUonQoL.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a general need for sharing practical examples of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) within the research field to learn from and inspire. The aim of this article is to describe our process evaluation of PPI within the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit, a new set of quality of life questionnaires aimed at people with (past experience of) cancer.

methodsFive co-researchers (people with cancer and informal caregivers) were recruited and received training and support from a dedicated team of researchers. Involvement in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit consisted of four major events: two workshops, a consensus meeting and a stakeholder forum. We have collected event documents, that is, meeting agendas, presentation slides, minutes of the events and minutes of meetings with co-researchers before and after the events, and qualitatively analysed these using the Cube Framework.

resultsOur process evaluation showed that, over time, discussions evolved from focusing on the technical aspects of the EUonQoL-Kit to co-researchers' experiences as input for the questionnaires. Researchers' inexperience with PPI prompted the organisation of a training workshop. After this, researchers prepared the co-researchers better for the meetings and engaged them more actively by asking specific questions. All these developments contributed to a more active participation of co-researchers.

conclusionPPI in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit was a learning process. Factors that helped include allocating time and resources, actively creating space for co-researchers' input, providing support by researchers specifically responsible for the PPI activities and realising the importance of informal contact. Future PPI efforts should incorporate these principles from the start to facilitate successful collaboration between researchers and co-researchers. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with cancer and informal caregivers played a significant role in this study. They were involved as co-researchers in all stages of the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit. In addition, they were involved in the qualitative analysis of the data presented in this article, the writing of the project report and the writing of this article as co-authors.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeHumansResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnairesco‐researchersEuropeoncologypatient and public involvementpatient participation

Identifiers

PMID40297991
PMCPMC12038435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.