ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025
Sexual quality of life after hysterectomy performed by conventional laparoscopy versus Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in benign gynaecology.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional Outcomes After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review of Sexual Function and Pelvic Floor Integrity.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of comprehensive nursing interventions on pain, recovery, and sexual quality of life in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization: A Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopy and vNOTES.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hysterectomy is a common surgical procedure in gynaecology, performed through abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic techniques. The vaginal route is typically preferred for benign conditions like fibroids, adenomyosis, and uterine prolapse due to shorter operative time, faster recovery, reduced pain, and fewer complications. In cases where the uterus is large or vaginal access is restricted, a laparoscopic approach may be necessary. A minimally invasive alternative, Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES), allows hysterectomy via vaginal access using a combination of endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques. Objectives: To evaluate if sexual quality of life (sQoL) is impaired by using vNOTES for hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy in benign gynaecology. Methods: A retrospective monocentric study. One hundred and twenty seven patients were included in the study. Of these, 91 underwent TLH and 36 vNOTES hysterectomies between September 2020 and October 2022 at Brugmann University Hospital. Main Outcome Measures: This study compares sQoL after hysterectomy performed via conventional laparoscopy versus vNOTES for benign gynecological conditions. Results: Regarding surgical characteristics, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, drop in blood haemoglobin levels and days of hospitalisation. Arousal and Orgasm scores are improved post-operatively in patients suffering from adenomyosis (4.47 vs. 3.91 Conclusions: The vNOTES method shows shorter hospital stay and faster re-introduction to sexual life over conventional laparoscopy for total hysterectomy in patients with benign gynaecology. What is New: Our study shows that in patients suffering from adenomyosis, sQoL improved after hysterectomy using the vNOTES approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.