ArticleCancer2025
Artificial intelligence-driven microsatellite instability profiling reveals distinctive genetic features in patients with lung cancer.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in translational lung cancer research in 2025: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Integrated DNA and RNA profiling refines prognostic stratification independent of therapeutic actionability in cholangiocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Enhancing Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: The Promise of dMMR/MSI-H Tumors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Lung adenocarcinoma and colorectal cancer as double primary malignancies reveal lynch syndrome: a case report of germline MLH1 mutation with response to immunotherapy and familial aggregation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) has emerged as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in various cancers, but its role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not fully understood.
methodsThe authors used the bioinformatics tool MIAmS to assess microsatellite status from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data using a tailored microsatellite score. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were also performed to evaluate the correspondence between MSI and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) status. A retrospective analysis of 1547 lung cancer patients was conducted, focusing on those with an MSI phenotype. Clinical characteristics, co-occurring molecular alterations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status were evaluated in this subset.
resultsOf the 1547 patients analyzed, eight (0.52%) were identified as having MSI through MIAmS, with six (0.39%) of these cases also being dMMR on IHC. All patients with dMMR had an MS score ≥2 and a history of smoking. Most patients showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 staining on IHC. No correlation was found between MSI status and programmed death-ligand 1 expression, although all MSI patients exhibited high TMB, averaging 21.4 ± 5.6 mutations per megabase. DISCUSSION: MSI/dMMR in lung cancer is exceedingly rare, affecting less than 1% of cases. NGS-based analysis combined with bioinformatics tools provides a robust method to identify MSI/dMMR patients, potentially guiding immunotherapy decisions. This comprehensive approach integrates molecular genotyping and MSI detection, offering personalized treatment options for lung cancer patients. NGS-based MSI testing is emerging as the preferred method for detecting microsatellite instability in various tumor types, including rare cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.