ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025
Infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia: a comprehensive overview to explore possible managements amidst limited scientific certainties.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tubo-ovarian abscess in an adolescent with uterine didelphys and prior cloacal repair: case report and literature review.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The uterus, a complex organ, performs crucial functions including fertilisation, embryonic implantation, and supporting fetal development. Infantile uterus, resembling a prepubescent girl's uterus, and uterine hypoplasia, characterised by a smaller than normal size but with a normal body/cervix ratio, present significant reproductive challenges. Objectives: This study aims to critically review the existing literature on the infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia, focusing on the aetiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment options. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted based on a thorough database search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by cross-referencing relevant articles. Inclusion criteria included studies on the aetiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic criteria based on measurements and therapeutic options. Results: The review revealed distinct characteristics of infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia. The infantile uterus has a body/cervix ratio of 1:1 or 1:2, resembling that of a prepubescent girl, while uterine hypoplasia maintains a normal body/cervix ratio of 2:1 but is smaller in size. Diagnostic criteria include a total uterine length of less than 6 cm and specific ultrasound features such as reduced intercornual distance. Therapeutic options include hormonal therapy, particularly oestrogen administration, and surgical interventions aimed at expanding the uterine cavity. Hormonal treatments showed variable effectiveness, primarily beneficial in cases of oestrogen deficiency, while surgical approaches demonstrated some success in enhancing fertility outcomes in women with a hypoplastic uterus. Conclusions: Infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia remain poorly understood, with no consensus on their aetiology. Accurate diagnosis relies on specific measurements and body/cervix ratios. Treatment options, including hormonal and surgical interventions, show limited success, indicating a need for further research to optimise management strategies. What is New?: This review highlights the diagnostic challenges and the limited efficacy of current treatments for infantile uterus and uterine hypoplasia, emphasising the need for standardised diagnostic criteria and further research aiming to elucidate more effective therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.