ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Iris implantation cysts growth five decades after trauma.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Ophthalmic endoscopy for complete resection of a symptomatic iris pigment epithelial cyst.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Implantation cysts of the iris are rare benign lesions resulting from epithelial downgrowth after trauma or surgery. This report highlights the management of an exceptional case of implantation cysts manifestation five decades after penetrating childhood trauma. Observation: A 59-year-old male patient with a history of penetrating trauma of the cornea at the age of 4 years presented with cystic anterior chamber lesions exhibiting pigment deposition. The pupil was distorted and almost entirely covered. 50 MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography displayed no evidence of malignancy. The cystic lesions were excised in an endothelium-protective manner and histopathological analysis revealed dysplasia-free corneal squamous epithelium compatible with implantation cysts of the iris. Conclusion and importance: Implantation cysts of the iris are benign and rare. Anterior segment imaging is required to exclude malignancies. Most cases emerge after surgery or trauma within months to a few years after injury. However, occurrence can also be delayed by several decades. It is thus mandatory to demand a full and long-lasting ophthalmological anamnesis, to accurately distinguish, diagnose, and treat cystic lesions of the iris.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.