ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Exploring grief and acceptance: Experiences and needs of family members of deceased organ donors.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue donation in forensic cases: a retrospective study from Sweden.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Faith, Culture and Professional Identity: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Nursing Students' Perspectives on Organ Donation in Türkiye.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- [Honor walk-a respectful farewell in the context of organ donation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Before considering organ donation, family members must come to terms with the fact that their loved one is brain dead and that organ donation is a meaningful path forward. This acceptance enables their consent to organ donation following brain death. This study was conducted to explore the experiences and needs of family members of deceased organ donors. Method: The study was conducted utilizing qualitative methods and conventional content analysis in accordance with Graneheim and Lundman's approach. Twelve family members of organ donors were chosen to participate through a combination of snowball and purposeful sampling methods. Data were gathered by using semi-structured interviews and critical discourse analysis. Results: Participants were 8 females and 4 males with a mean age of 55.25 ± 13.02. Data analysis led to the emergence of 2 themes (supporting system and coping strategy), 6 subthemes (psychological issues, social issues, communication with others, social support, meaning-making, coping with their grief), 17 categories (grief processing, emotional resilience, understanding mixed emotion, social support networks, stigma, social interaction, communal narratives, narrative therapy approaches, open communication, coping strategies, professional support, support groups, honor their memory, practice self-care, seek spiritual support, create rituals, be patient with grief, and limit stressors), 65 subcategories, and 1237 initial codes. Conclusions: To improve the organ donation process and support donor families, it is suggested that appropriate infrastructures and counseling groups for families be considered. The study recommends improving education and cultural sensitivity about brain death, providing counseling for families, and creating support networks. Furthermore, clearer communication about organ allocation can also help build trust between families and medical institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.