Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297781›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Improving team dynamics in an acute older people care unit to improve quality and safety of care.

Rachid Akrour, Anja Pattschull, Suzana Stamenkovic, Catherine Courret Gilgen, Alberto Garcia Manjon, Yvan Bourgeois, Joachim Rapin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachid AkrourDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-9089
Anja PattschullDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Suzana StamenkovicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine Courret GilgenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alberto Garcia ManjonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yvan BourgeoisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Service of Geriatrics Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joachim RapinHealthcare Direction, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have demonstrated that the team dynamic among healthcare professionals has an impact on the quality of care, as well as the satisfaction of healthcare team members at work. The Input-Process-Output and Intervention model is one way to structure complex interventions with the aim of improving the team dynamic and evaluating their impact on the healthcare professional team, patients, and the organization. Objective: The objective of the study was to describe the steps and results of a quality improvement project aimed at improving the team dynamic of healthcare professionals in the acute older people care unit of a university hospital and improving outcomes for the healthcare professional team, patients, and the organization. Method: The project was based on the Deming cycle framework (Plan-Do-Check-Act) for improving the quality of care. It consisted of the following steps: (1) Implementation plan with an iterative process; (2) interventions according to the Input-Process-Output and Intervention model; and (3) evaluation of the impact of these interventions. Results: The results demonstrated an improvement in most healthcare professional team outcomes, particularly in terms of satisfaction and absenteeism, as well as organizational outcomes. Patient outcomes were highly satisfactory and relatively stable throughout the process. Conclusion: The integration of a healthcare professional team dynamic improvement model into quality and safety of care processes should be considered to optimize clinical and organizational outcomes.

Indexed as

occupational healthPatient care teampatient safetyquality improvementwork satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40297781
PMCPMC12035220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.