ArticleIntegrative medicine research2025
Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: Results of the chronic pain cohort.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01754038 (Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Interventions Effectiveness Registry), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Interventions Effectiveness Registry
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: An increasing number of clinics are providing integrative medicine for chronic pain, creating a need for real-world, practice-based research. Our purpose was to conduct a multi-site prospective, practice-based, observational evaluation of patient reported outcomes in chronic pain patients. Methods: This study took place at seventeen BraveNet Practice Based Research Network integrative medicine clinics. Chronic pain patients receiving personalized, integrative medicine interventions at BraveNet clinics were eligible. Participants completed the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29, Perceived Stress Scale-4, and the Patient Activation Measure at the index/baseline visit and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months. Diagnostic and billing codes were extracted data from patients' health records. Linear mixed-model and multi-variate analyses evaluated changes from index visit through 12 months. Results: A total of 4883 patients enrolled, 3658 qualified and 967 of them endorsed chronic pain, completed at least two outcomes at 2 time points, had evaluable electronic health record data, and had at least one integrative medicine visit during the study period. Participants had a mean age of 51.6 years (SD 13.88) and were mostly white (81.8 %), female (78.3 %), educated (≥ college degree: 70.1 %). Significant improvements were observed on all 7 Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System subscales, Perceived Stress Scale, and Patient Activation Measure scores at 12 months. Conclusions: Chronic pain patients receiving care at integrative medicine clinics reported significant improvement over time in multiple domains of pain and quality of life. Future research with more sites and a common set of outcomes would further guide clinical practice. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01754038.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.