ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative sensory testing in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and reliability of pressure algometry for mechanical nociceptive threshold quantification in lambs in a field environment.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correlation of Mechanical Thresholds, Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and Sharp and Wheeler Grading Scale in Dogs with Acute Thoracolumbar Disc Extrusions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate changes in somatosensory sensitivity in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis (OA) and pain of the stifle or hip, compared to a group of healthy control dogs. Study design: A non-randomised, non-blinded, prospective research study. Animals: 30 control, 51 OA-pain, and 31 OA-pain dogs receiving NSAIDs. Methods: A range of noxious and non-noxious quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities were applied. Dogs were tested twice, one month apart. Two sites were tested at each visit: a distal site located on the cranial aspect of the mid metatarsus and a primary site, lateral to the patella (in dogs with stifle OA) or craniodorsally to the greater trochanter (in dogs with coxofemoral OA). Control dogs were tested at appropriate primary sites to produce the same proportion of animals being tested at stifle or hip as those in the OA group. The order in which non-nociceptive and nociceptive tests were performed was randomized for each test site for each animal, although nociceptive tests were always performed after non-nociceptive tests. Feasibility for performing the tests was assessed for the final 45 dogs recruited to the study. The hierarchical structure of the QST testing data was accounted for within the statistical analysis by employing general linear modelling within a multilevel modelling framework using the MLwiN statistics package. Results: Osteoarthritis category was not a major determinant of QST outcome measures for the majority of modalities evaluated. In the few modalities in which OA category was determined to be a significant predictor variable, the results were not consistent with previously reported data. The novel, non-nociceptive tests employed overall suggested non-noxious hypoesthesia in association with OA pain. The feasibility of performing QST assessments was relatively low compared to previous studies. Conclusions: and clinical relevance: In a clinical environment, the variability in feasibility of performing QST between dogs may be sufficient to confound changes in QST outcome measures associated with spontaneous OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.