Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

Quantitative sensory testing in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis.

James Russell Hunt, David Knazovicky, Megan Goff, John Harris, Toby G Knowles, Masataka Enomoto, Michael Mendl, Becky Whay, B Duncan X Lascelles, Joanna C Murrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James Russell Hunt *Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
David Knazovicky *Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Megan GoffBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
John HarrisArthritis Research UK Pain Centre and Division of Animal Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Toby G KnowlesBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Masataka EnomotoTranslational Research in Pain, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Michael MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Becky WhayNatural Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
B Duncan X LascellesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Joanna C MurrellBristol Vet Specialists, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate changes in somatosensory sensitivity in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis (OA) and pain of the stifle or hip, compared to a group of healthy control dogs. Study design: A non-randomised, non-blinded, prospective research study. Animals: 30 control, 51 OA-pain, and 31 OA-pain dogs receiving NSAIDs. Methods: A range of noxious and non-noxious quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities were applied. Dogs were tested twice, one month apart. Two sites were tested at each visit: a distal site located on the cranial aspect of the mid metatarsus and a primary site, lateral to the patella (in dogs with stifle OA) or craniodorsally to the greater trochanter (in dogs with coxofemoral OA). Control dogs were tested at appropriate primary sites to produce the same proportion of animals being tested at stifle or hip as those in the OA group. The order in which non-nociceptive and nociceptive tests were performed was randomized for each test site for each animal, although nociceptive tests were always performed after non-nociceptive tests. Feasibility for performing the tests was assessed for the final 45 dogs recruited to the study. The hierarchical structure of the QST testing data was accounted for within the statistical analysis by employing general linear modelling within a multilevel modelling framework using the MLwiN statistics package. Results: Osteoarthritis category was not a major determinant of QST outcome measures for the majority of modalities evaluated. In the few modalities in which OA category was determined to be a significant predictor variable, the results were not consistent with previously reported data. The novel, non-nociceptive tests employed overall suggested non-noxious hypoesthesia in association with OA pain. The feasibility of performing QST assessments was relatively low compared to previous studies. Conclusions: and clinical relevance: In a clinical environment, the variability in feasibility of performing QST between dogs may be sufficient to confound changes in QST outcome measures associated with spontaneous OA.

Indexed as

central sensitisationdogpainquantitative sensorial testing (QST)spontaneous osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID40297737
PMCPMC12034712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.