ArticleResearch square2025
Identifying Alzheimer's Disease Progression Subphenotypes via a Graph-based Framework using Electronic Health Records.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Understanding the heterogeneity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) development, as well as identifying AD progression pathways, is vital for enhancing diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and prevention strategies. To identify disease progression subphenotypes in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD using electronic health records (EHRs). Methods: We identified patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD from the electronic health records from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We proposed an outcome-oriented graph neural network-based model to identify progression pathways from MCI to AD. Results: Of the included 2,525 patients, 61.66% were female, and the mean age was 76. In this cohort, 64.83% were Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 16.48% were Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 2.53% were of other races. Additionally, there were 274 Hispanic patients, accounting for 10.85% of the total patient population. The average duration from the first MCI diagnosis to the transition to AD was 891 days. We identified four progression subphenotypes, each with distinct characteristics. The average progression times from MCI to AD varied among these subphenotypes, ranging from 805 to 1,236 days. Conclusion: The findings suggest that AD does not follow uniform transitions of disease states but rather exhibits heterogeneous progression pathways. Our proposed framework holds the potential to identify AD progression subphenotypes, providing valuable and explainable insights for the development of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.