ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
Predicting Radiation Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Synchronous Boost Radiotherapy Post-Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study constructed a predictive model for occurrence of radiation esophagitis during breast-cancer radiotherapy. 308 breast-cancer patients were analyzed. Lasso regression identified crucial variables that were further integrated into a radiation esophagitis risk score, which was used to segregate patients into high- and low-risk groups. A nomogram model was designed for clinical applicability. Training and validations were performed to assess robustness and generalizability of proposed models, employing C-index, AUCs, calibration curves, and decision curves. SHAP algorithm was used for model interpretation, offering insights into the major contributory factors. Seven significant variables were identified by Lasso regression. C-indexes of nomograms of individual clinical variables and risk score were 0.795 and 0.784, respectively, exhibiting strong predictive ability. In internal validation, AUCs for risk score, nomogram, and logistic models were 0.784, 0.795, and 0.812, respectively. Calibration curves showed a close fit between predicted and observed outcomes across models. Decision curve analysis indicated logistic model's superior clinical utility when the risk threshold was above 0.2. SHAP interpretation emphasized radiation dose, pruritus, molecular type, and hepatic dysfunction as top contributory factors for radiation esophagitis. Models based on interpretable machine learning offer an intuitive tool to assess risk of radiation esophagitis in breast-cancer radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.