Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297634›Full record

ReviewComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2025

Weight-based discrimination and cortisol output: A systematic review.

Maria A Kalantzis, Daniel M Maitland, Miranda Yannon, Christina Gaggiano, Jinbo He, Aldo Barrita, Lorelai Symmes, William H O'Brien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria A KalantzisDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, USA.
Daniel M MaitlandDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, University of Missouri Kansas City, USA.
Miranda YannonDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, USA.
Christina GaggianoDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, USA.
Jinbo HeSchool of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Aldo BarritaDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, USA.
Lorelai SymmesDepartment of Psychology, St. Mary's College of Maryland, USA.
William H O'BrienDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination based on weight status (or weight-related discrimination/stigma) may be related to greater physical and mental health concerns via physiological and psychological phenotypes of stress. Cortisol output, a biomarker of stress, has been measured in relation to weight stigma and weight-related discrimination. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing research on the relationship between weight-related discrimination and cortisol output, evaluate methodological approaches for measuring these constructs, and identify research gaps regarding contextual factors influencing this relationship. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases (PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) from February 1 to July 1, 2024, resulting in 11 eligible studies that examined weight discrimination in relation to cortisol levels. Studies were assessed for quality using the NHLBI Study Quality Assessment Tool, and inter-rater reliability for coding was established at 90 %. The findings revealed a range of sample sizes (45-4341) and diverse participant characteristics, including variations in age, race, and body mass index (BMI). About half (N = 5) of the included studies reported a positive relation between weight stigma and cortisol output. The review also uncovered significant limitations in current methodologies, particularly concerning contextual factors and other marginalized identities, such as socioeconomic status and food insecurity, along with measuring other forms of discrimination in tandem with weight stigma, such as racial discrimination. These findings underscore the need for future research to adopt a more intersectional approach in examining the multifaceted nature of weight stigma and how it relates to a greater stress response in multiple marginalized identities, as well as including longitudinal modeling of weight stigma's impact on biomarkers for stress.

Indexed as

Adults with overweight/obesityCortisol outputCortisol reactivityPerceived discriminationWeightWeight discrimination

Identifiers

PMID40297634
PMCPMC12036022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.