Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring the effect of leader other-oriented perfectionism on radical innovation.

Le Wang, Yu Wang, Xiu Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Le WangDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yu WangDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Xiu JinDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid shifts in the global economy have increased the demand for innovation within companies, with radical innovation being a key factor for achieving competitive advantage, organizational success, and sustainable growth. Leadership traits can significantly affect employee behavior and attitudes, which in turn, can influence their work. leader's others-oriented perfectionism, representing the interaction between a perfectionist leader and their employees, is particularly relevant in the workplace. Methods: This study constructed a theoretical model to explore the relationship between leadership perfectionism and employee radical innovation and validated it through empirical research. Results: The findings indicate that there is a positive correlation between leader's others-oriented perfectionism and employees' work engagement, which in turn is related to radical innovation. In addition, there is a moderating effect of leader's conscientiousness between the effects of perfectionism on employee work engagement. Employee promotion focus moderated the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between leader perfectionism and employee radical innovation. Discussion: The purpose of this study is to reveal the relationship between leadership perfectionism and employee work engagement and to explore how these findings can help organizations enhance employee breakthrough innovation. The findings will provide specific practical guidance for managers to encourage the combination of leadership perfectionism and accountability to drive employee work engagement and expand employee facilitation focus, ultimately impacting breakthrough innovation.

Indexed as

conscientiousnessleader’s other-oriented perfectionismpromotion focusradical innovationwork engagement

Identifiers

PMID40297597
PMCPMC12035641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.