ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025
Using discrete choice experiments to elicit palliative care preferences in lower middle-income countries: An exploratory study in Bhutan.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Design and delivery of specific palliative care in many lower middle-income countries such as Bhutan remains limited. Designing care programmes to respond to the needs of patients and family networks is essential, but evidence on these preferences is limited. Aim: We have conducted a discrete choice experiment on Bhutanese patients and family members to explore preferences for palliative care. Design: The discrete choice experiment consisted of 15 choice tasks in which each respondent considered two competing palliative care services. Data were collected through the recruitment of respondents in conjunction with the clinician support teams, with data collected from both patients and their family members. All responses were pooled across the groups and analysed using the conditional logit regression model. Setting/participants: Fifty-seven respondents (20 patients and 37 family members) out of 98 (50 patients and 48 family members) identified (58.2%) were recruited through the three large referral hospitals in Bhutan. Patients had to be diagnosed with an advanced illness or at the end-of-life phase, but be able to understand and be willing to complete the survey. Similarly, family members had to be willing and able to complete the survey, and to be defined as the primary caregiver by the patient. Results: Transparent information provision, cost, family training and use of traditional healing practices were keen drivers of choice, with location of care and place of death relatively less important. Conclusion: Our results will guide future service design decisions in Bhutan and demonstrate the need for localised preference studies to enable culturally appropriate care including the provision of traditional healing practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.