Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2025

Multi-environment trials data analysis: linear mixed model-based approaches using spatial and factor analytic models.

Tarekegn Argaw, Berhanu Amsalu Fenta, Habtemariam Zegeye, Girum Azmach, Assefa Funga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimizing resource allocation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarekegn ArgawClimate and Computational Science Research Directorate, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Berhanu Amsalu FentaCollege of Agriculture & Environmental Science-African Sustainable Agriculture Research Institute (ASARI), University Mohammed VI Polytheistic (UM6P), Ben Guerir, Morocco.
Habtemariam ZegeyeKulumsa Agricultural Research Center, EIAR, Assela, Ethiopia.
Girum AzmachBako Agricultural Research Center, EIAR, Bako, Ethiopia.
Assefa FungaDebre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, EIAR, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of multi-environment trials (MET) data in plant breeding and agricultural research is inherently challenging, with conventional ANOVA-based methods exhibiting limitations as the complexity of MET experiments grows. This study presents linear mixed model-based approaches for MET data analysis. Ten MET grain yield datasets from national variety trials in Ethiopia were used. Randomized complete block (RCB) design analysis, spatial analysis, and spatial+genotype-by-environment (G × E) analysis were compared under linear mixed model framework. Spatial analysis detected significant local, global, and extraneous spatial variations, with positive spatial correlations. For the spatial + G × E analysis, increasing the order of the factor analytic (FA) models improved the explanation of G × E variance, though the optimal FA model order was dataset-dependent. Integrating spatial variability through the spatial + G × E modeling approach substantially improved genetic parameter estimates and minimized residual variability. This improvement was particularly notable in larger datasets, where the number of trials and the size of each trial played a crucial role for presence of spatial variability and strong GxE effects. Additionally, the genetic correlation heat maps and dendrograms provided intuitive insights into trial relationships, revealing patterns of strong positive, negative, and weak correlations, as well as distinct trial clusters. The results clearly demonstrate that linear mixed model-based approaches, especially the spatial + G × E analysis excel in capturing complex spatial plot variation and G × E effects in MET data by effectively integrating spatial and FA models. These insights have important implications for improving the efficiency and accuracy of MET data analysis, which is crucial for improving genetic gain estimation in plant breeding and agricultural research, ultimately accelerating the delivery of high-performing crop varieties to farmers and consumers.

Indexed as

genetic gainlinear mixed modelsmulti-environment trialsspatial analysisspatial + G × E analysis

Identifiers

PMID40297568
PMCPMC12034942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.