ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Polygenic scores capture genetic modification of the adiposity-cardiometabolic risk factor relationship.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal use of genetics for precision medicine requires polygenic scores (PGS) that predict not just risk of disease, but also response to pharmaceutical or lifestyle interventions. These are detectable in observational datasets as PGS-by-exposure (PGS×E) interactions. Existing literature suggests that PGS based on interactions (iPGS) or variance effects (vPGS) may be more powerful than standard marginal PGS (mPGS) for the detection of PGS×E, but these have yet to be systematically compared. We describe a generalized pipeline for the development and comparison of different PGS types and apply it to detect genetic modification of the relationship between adiposity (measured by body mass index [BMI]) and a broad set of cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs). Our applied analysis in the UK Biobank cohort identified significant PGS×BMI for at least one PGS type for 16/20 of these CRFs, many of which replicated in the All of Us cohort. Among PGS types, iPGS uncovered interactions with BMI most consistently across CRFs, with the strongest interactions impacting biomarkers of liver function (e.g., alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Exploring the ALT iPGS more in-depth, we find a substantial effect modification of up to 72% larger BMI-ALT association in the top iPGS decile in All of Us, and further provide evidence that the iPGS prioritizes variants affecting hepatic lipid export. Taken together, our study provides a framework for the development and comparison of PGS×E strategies, quantifies genetic impacts on the adiposity-cardiometabolic risk relationship, and informs efforts to move toward clinically useful response-focused PGS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.