ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Independent validation of the PrecivityAD2
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The diagnostic performance of the Amyloid Probability Score 2 (APS2) - the algorithmic result of the PrecivityAD2 Methods: Plasma biomarker ratios Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 (expressed as %p-tau217) were quantified and incorporated into the APS2 algorithm in samples obtained from 192 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants with CI (70% mild cognitive impairment / 30% dementia). APS2 diagnostic performance was determined using amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) as the reference standard. Plasma biomarkers were quantified in a CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory (C2N Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: APS2 values were significantly higher in the 56% of CI participants with a positive amyloid PET scan. Concordance with amyloid PET was high (AUC-ROC 0.95 (95%CI): 0.93-0.98); 54% of participants had a positive APS2. The previously validated APS2 cut point yielded an overall accuracy of 91% (95%CI: 86-94%), sensitivity 90% (95%CI: 83-94%) and specificity 92% (95%CI: 84-96%). Interpretation: The PrecivityAD2 blood test's APS2 identified brain amyloid pathology with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ≥ 90% in this intended use population. This external validation reaffirms the diagnostic robustness of this blood biomarker test and supports its use as a confirmatory test, consistent with published expert recommendations, for assessment of presence or absence of brain amyloid pathology in symptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.