ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
A hierarchical analysis of perceived team personality traits in sport.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to revisit and enhance the foundational concept of perceived team personality by addressing critical conceptual and methodological challenges in previous brand personality studies. While prior studies have identified team personality dimensions and developed measurement scales, ongoing ambiguities in applying the general brand personality conceptualization to sport teams remain. In addition, the approach's limited generalizability, inadequate methods for selecting descriptors, and biases in team (brand) selection pose significant challenges to make a valid and reliable team personality scale in sports. Methods: To overcome these limitations, this study employs a lexical approach from personality psychology, which posits that fundamental personality dimensions emerge naturally from the adjectives people use to describe themselves and others. By analyzing a set of 99 sport-specific personality descriptors based on the lexical approach, this study explores hierarchical solutions ranging from one to six factors to determine whether perceived team personality dimensions align with established human personality models, such as the Big Five and HEXACO frameworks. Results: Findings reveal that the five- and six-factor models exhibit strong conceptual alignment with these established human personality structures, demonstrating the efficacy of the lexical approach in capturing sport team personality. Discussion: This research strengthens the theoretical and methodological foundation for assessing team personality in sport by providing a solid framework that better aligns with consumer perceptions. These insights may contribute to a more precise and contextually relevant understanding of team personality, offering implications for sport brand management, consumer engagement strategies, and long-term team positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.