Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297380›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Linking online health information seeking to cancer information overload among Chinese cancer patients' family members.

Yifang Wu, Luxi Zhang, Xinshu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifang WuArt School, Huzhou University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8614-9683
Luxi ZhangDepartment of Communication, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8895-3006
Xinshu ZhaoDepartment of Communication, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While previous studies indicated that seeking online health information could reduce individuals' cancer information overload, the results are inconsistent and have remained unknown in China. This study focuses on cancer patients' family members to determine whether online health information seeking helps lessen cancer information overload and the processes underlying this association. Objective: To examine the relationship between online health information seeking and cancer information overload through psychological empowerment and anxiety in the sequel, we carried out a quota sampling online survey in mainland China in 2023. We also looked at the underlying mechanism's moderated role in eHealth literacy. Methods: We standardized all variables from 0 to 1 using a Min-max normalization and conducted Model 6 and Model 92 of Process Macro to examine the mediation and moderation effects. The final sample size was 628 cancer patients' family members. Results: We found that online health information seeking negatively impacted cancer information overload through psychological empowerment and anxiety ( Conclusion: The findings can be used by healthcare workers, public health policymakers, and online health information providers to advise Chinese cancer patients' family members about the overwhelming amount of information they may encounter when seeking online health information.

Indexed as

anxietyCancer information overloadeHealth literacyonline health information seekingpsychological empowerment

Identifiers

PMID40297380
PMCPMC12035502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.