ArticleDigital health
Development of a deep learning model to predict smoking status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional national survey.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning based decision tree model for predicting obstructive airway disease in a large non-smoking health screening population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Construction and Validation of a Prediction Model for Sustained Smoking Cessation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Global Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Symptom-Based, and Outcome Prediction Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning model to predict smoking status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using data from a national survey. Methods: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018) were used to extract 5466 COPD-eligible cases. The data collection involved demographic, behavioral, and clinical variables, including 21 predictors such as age, sex, and pulmonary function test results. The dependent variable, smoking status, was categorized as smoker or nonsmoker. A residual neural network (ResNN) model was developed and compared with five machine learning algorithms (random forest, decision tree, Gaussian Naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbor, and AdaBoost) and two deep learning models (multilayer perceptron and TabNet). Internal validation was performed using five-fold cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Results: The ResNN achieved an AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.73, 70.1%, 75.2%, and 0.67, respectively, outperforming previous machine learning and deep learning models in predicting smoking status in patients with COPD. Explainable artificial intelligence (Shapley additive explanations) identified key predictors, including sex, age, and perceived health status. Conclusion: This deep learning model accurately predicts smoking status in patients with COPD, offering potential as a decision-support tool to detect high-risk persistent smokers for targeted interventions. Future studies should focus on external validation and incorporate additional behavioral and psychological variables to improve its generalizability and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.