Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297368›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital health interventions for spinal surgery patients: A systematic scoping review.

Annemieke Y van der Horst, Saskia M Kelders, Ernst T Bohlmeijer, Karlein M G Schreurs, Jan S Jukema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annemieke Y van der HorstResearch group Smart Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-0163
Saskia M KeldersDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth & Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-6871
Ernst T BohlmeijerDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth & Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-1245
Karlein M G SchreursDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth & Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-0151
Jan S JukemaResearch group Smart Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-4664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The potential of digital health interventions to optimize healthcare is promising also in the context of spinal surgery. However, a systematic review assessing the quality of digital health interventions for spinal surgery patients and the potential effects on these patients is lacking. Method: The objective of the current scoping review was to provide a systematic overview of digital health interventions for spinal surgery patients described in scientific literature. The focus was on describing the current digital health interventions, assessing the quality of these descriptions, reviewing the reported effects and assessing the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: A total of 14 full-text articles, describing 11 digital health interventions were included in the final analysis. These digital health interventions ranged from a website and app to a mobile phone messaging system and mobile phone interface. Most digital health interventions aim to improve adherence to rehabilitation guidelines and physical health. The included studies were generally of moderate to high quality and showed significant effects on physical health. Vital aspects of digital interventions such as "working mechanism theory" and "prompts and reminders" were often absent in the description of interventions. Conclusion: The study of digital interventions for spinal surgery patient is emerging and promising. However, there is a scarcity of studies using a rigorous design. A more systematic and comprehensive framework for developing and describing digital interventions for spinal surgery patients is highly recommended.

Indexed as

digital behavior change interventiondigital health interventioneHealthmHealthspinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID40297368
PMCPMC12035155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.