ArticleDigital health
Enhancing stroke-associated pneumonia prediction in ischemic stroke: An interpretable Bayesian network approach.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- European stroke organisation guideline on stroke-associated pneumonia.European stroke journal · 2026Guideline
- Building a SHAP interpretable prediction model for stroke-associated pneumonia [stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP)] in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia in older patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a major cause of mortality following ischemic stroke (IS). However, existing predictive models for SAP often lack transparency and interpretability, limiting their clinical utility. This study aims to develop an interpretable Bayesian network (BN) model for predicting SAP in IS patients, focusing on enhancing both predictive accuracy and clinical interpretability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with IS and admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January and December 2019. Clinical data collected within 48 h of admission and SAP occurrences within 7 days were analyzed. Dimensionality reduction was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, while data imbalances were addressed using synthetic minority oversampling technique. A BN model was trained using a hill-climbing algorithm and compared to logistic regression, decision trees, deep neural networks, and existing risk-scoring systems. Decision curve analysis was used to assess clinical usefulness. Results: Of the 1252 patients, 165 (13.18%) patients had SAP within 7 days of admission. The BN model identified age, risk of pressure injury (PI), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as significant prognostic factors. The BN model achieved an area under the curve of 0.85(95% CI: 0.78-0.92) on the test set, outperforming other models and demonstrating a greater net benefit in clinical decision-making. Conclusions: Age, risk of PI, NIHSS score, and CRP are significant predictors of SAP in IS patients. The interpretable BN model demonstrates superior predictive performance and interpretability, suggesting its potential as an effective and interpretable tool for clinical decision support in SAP risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.