ArticleDigital health
Effect of patient satisfaction on the utilization of mHealth services by patients with chronic disease.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural analysis of causal pathways between adherence, satisfaction and clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients using a mobile adherence intervention: A SEM-NCA-cIPMA approach.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Trial
- Exploring Self-Management-Based Mobile Health User Typologies and Associations Between User Types and Satisfaction With Key Mobile Health Functions: Comparative Study of Various Fitness and Weight Management App User Types.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- The utilization, characteristics, and influencing factors of non-therapeutic traditional Chinese medicine services among middle-aged and older population in Guangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Leveraging mobile fitness apps for healthier lifestyles: How affordances drive sustained engagement.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile health (mHealth) is considered an effective way to manage chronic disease patients' health. However, patients often do not use or continue using mHealth services due to concerns about service quality. Patient satisfaction may influence their utilization, and this effect may be moderated by platform regulations and differences in physicians' qualifications and regions. Objective: This study aims to enhance mHealth service utilization by examining how patient satisfaction affects both use and continuous use behaviors. It also explores the role of platform regulations (recommendation, commenting, and reward systems) and assesses differences due to physician proficiency and regional variations. Methods: Data were collected from Haodf, a leading mHealth platform in China, from October 2021 to March 2022 at 3-month intervals. Generalized additive models were used to verify nonlinear relationships between patient satisfaction and their utilization behaviors. The role of platform regulations and heterogeneity analysis regarding physician region was also examined. Results: Efficacy satisfaction positively influenced mHealth service utilization ( Conclusions: Efficacy satisfaction drives mHealth service utilization, while efficacy and attitude satisfaction drive continuous use. Recommendation and commenting systems exhibit a positive synergistic effect, while the reward system plays a supplementary role. Professional recommendations and high-quality evaluations enhance the evaluation system's reliability, promoting service utilization. Patients in big cities are more sensitive to physicians' proficiency and therapeutic effects. A multidimensional, transparent evaluation and feedback system should be integrated into the platform to improve service quality and increase patient utilization and loyalty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.