ArticleDigital health
Developing and validating a machine learning-based model for predicting in-hospital mortality among ICU-admitted heart failure patients: A study utilizing the MIMIC-III database.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Clinician Trust in AI Diagnostics: A Dynamic Framework for Confidence Calibration and Transparency.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accelerating the performance of machine learning classifiers using bacterial colony optimization for heart disease prediction.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the assessment of in-hospital mortality risk among heart failure patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial for clinical decision-making, there is currently a lack of comprehensive models accurately predicting their prognosis. Machine learning techniques offer a powerful means to identify potential risk factors and predict outcomes within multivariable clinical data. Methods: This study, based on the MIMIC-III database, extracted demographic characteristics, vital signs, laboratory test values, and comorbidity information of heart failure patients using structured query language. LASSO regression was employed for feature selection, and various machine learning algorithms were utilized to train models, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB), among others. An ensemble learning model based on a soft voting mechanism was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and AUC values through cross-validation and on an independent test set. Results: In five-fold cross-validation, the soft voting ensemble learning model demonstrated the best overall performance, with accuracy and AUC values both at 0.86. Additionally, RF and GB models also performed well, with RF achieving an accuracy of 0.79 and an AUC of 0.79 on the independent test set, while the GB model achieved an accuracy of 0.77 and an AUC of 0.79. In contrast, other models such as LR, SVM, and KNN exhibited poorer performance in terms of accuracy and AUC values, indicating the significant advantage of ensemble methods in handling complex clinical prediction tasks. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models, particularly ensemble learning models based on soft voting mechanisms, in predicting in-hospital mortality risk among heart failure patients in the ICU. The overall performance of the ensemble learning model confirms its effectiveness as an adjunct clinical decision-making tool. Future research should further optimize the models and validate them in a broader patient population to enhance their practical utility and accuracy in real clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.