ArticleDigital health
Breathing together: A global hashtag analysis of #LungHealth on platform X (formerly Twitter).
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global English-language-dominated discourse on artificial intelligence in healthcare: a three-year longitudinal analysis of the #AIinHealthcare movement on X.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The X platform has gained popularity in healthcare, with posts among physicians increasing by 112% over five years. In the context of pulmonology, #LungHealth is used for engagement, spreading awareness, and disseminating information on respiratory diseases, yet its impact remains unexplored. Objective: We aim to analyze #LungHealth by measuring outreach and quantitative engagement metrics associated with #LungHealth. Methods: We conducted an analysis of #LungHealth posts over social media platform X (formerly Twitter) using Fedica, an analytic tool over 2 years from 1st May 2022 to 1st May 2024. This analysis studied quantitative metrics such as the number of posts, likes, views, user's geographical distribution, and co-occurring hashtags. Results: This hashtag analysis of #LungHealth for 2 years resulted in a total of 13,824 posts. The study showed that these posts were generated by 6100 active users producing over 80 million impressions. The posts garnered 1116 replies and 19,006 likes. Geographical distribution showed the posts spanning across 105 countries. The top 10 countries with the highest number of posts were the USA, India, UK, Canada, Australia, Nigeria, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Kenya. Common co-occurring hashtags identified were #COPD, #COVID19, #Lungcancer, and #Asthma. The top 10 influencers consisted of six Indian media outlets, one health company, one educational institution, one Arabic media outlet, and one American journalist. Conclusion: This is the first study that provides a unique perspective on utilizing #LungHealth as a tool for global engagement in promoting lung health awareness and reaching various audiences on a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.