Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297334›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

AI-assisted early screening, diagnosis, and intervention for autism in young children.

Sijun Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sijun ZhangInstitute of Educational Sciences, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is a serious threat to an individual's physical and mental health. Early screening, diagnosis, and intervention can effectively reduce the level of deficits in individuals with autism. However, traditional methods of screening, diagnosis, and intervention rely on the professionalism of psychiatrists and require a great deal of time and effort, resulting in a large proportion of individuals with autism being diagnosed after the age of 6. Artificial intelligence (AI) combined with machine learning is being used to improve the efficiency of early screening, diagnosis, and intervention of autism in young children. This review aims to summarize AI-assisted methods for early screening, diagnosis, and intervention of autism in young children (infants, toddlers, and preschoolers). To achieve early screening and diagnosis of autism in young children, AI methods have built predictive models to improve the automation of early behavioral diagnosis, analyzed brain imaging and genetic data to break the age barrier for diagnosis, and established intelligent screening systems for early mass screening. For early intervention of autism in young children, AI methods built intelligent education systems to optimize the teaching and learning environment and provide individualized interventions, constructed intelligent monitoring systems for dynamic tracking, and created intelligent support systems to provide continuous support and meet the diverse needs of young children with autism. As AI continues to develop, further research is needed to build a large and shared database on autism, to generalize and migrate the effects of AI interventions, and to improve the appearance and performance of AI-powered robots, to reduce failure rates and costs of AI technologies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautismearly diagnosisearly interventionearly screeningmachine learningyoung children

Identifiers

PMID40297334
PMCPMC12036476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.