Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297285›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

3D bioprinting for bile duct tissue engineering: current status and prospects.

Bo Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bo GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bile duct disorders, including cholangiocarcinoma, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and iatrogenic injuries, pose significant clinical challenges due to limited regenerative capacity and the complexity of the biliary tree. In recent years, 3D bioprinting has emerged as a promising approach for bile duct tissue engineering by providing patient-specific geometries and facilitating the spatial organization of cells, scaffolding materials, and bioactive factors. This review presents a comprehensive overview of 3D bioprinting techniques for bile duct tissue engineering, focusing on fundamental principles, biomaterial selection, current achievements, key challenges, and future perspectives. We systematically discuss the latest technological breakthroughs, highlight emerging innovations such as organoid-based strategies and microfluidic-assisted 3D printing, and evaluate the prospects for clinical translation. Finally, we outline the main challenges-such as biocompatibility of materials, vascularization, immunological barriers, standardization of protocols, and regulatory hurdles-and propose directions for future research, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration and translational studies.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbile duct tissue engineeringbioinksregenerative medicinevascularization

Identifiers

PMID40297285
PMCPMC12034648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.