ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Cross-subject affective analysis based on dynamic brain functional networks.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emotion recognition is crucial in facilitating human-computer emotional interaction. To enhance the credibility and realism of emotion recognition, researchers have turned to physiological signals, particularly EEG signals, as they directly reflect cerebral cortex activity. However, due to inter-subject variability and non-smoothness of EEG signals, the generalization performance of models across subjects remains a challenge. Methods: In this study, we proposed a novel approach that combines time-frequency analysis and brain functional networks to construct dynamic brain functional networks using sliding time windows. This integration of time, frequency, and spatial domains helps to effectively capture features, reducing inter-individual differences, and improving model generalization performance. To construct brain functional networks, we employed mutual information to quantify the correlation between EEG channels and set appropriate thresholds. We then extracted three network attribute features-global efficiency, local efficiency, and local clustering coefficients-to achieve emotion classification based on dynamic brain network features. Results: The proposed method is evaluated on the DEAP dataset through subject-dependent (trial-independent), subject-independent, and subject- and trial-independent experiments along both valence and arousal dimensions. The results demonstrate that our dynamic brain functional network outperforms the static brain functional network in all three experimental cases. High classification accuracies of 90.89% and 91.17% in the valence and arousal dimensions, respectively, were achieved on the subject-independent experiments based on the dynamic brain function, leading to significant advancements in EEG-based emotion recognition. In addition, experiments with each brain region yielded that the left and right temporal lobes focused on processing individual private emotional information, whereas the remaining brain regions paid attention to processing basic emotional information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.