SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Current hotspot and study trend of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2023.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), alternatively termed transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), represents a seminal advancement in cardiovascular interventions by obviating the necessity for open-heart surgery traditionally associated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This technique entails percutaneous delivery of a bioprosthetic valve. Despite the surfeit of literature on TAVR over the past fifteen years, a bibliometric analysis is conspicuously absent. Method: A query executed on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on September 1, 2022, returned 8,359 articles and reviews pertinent to TAVR. Data interpretation leveraged Microsoft Excel, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer to illustrate trends and delineate focal points within the corpus of TAVR research. Result: The analysis incorporated 8,359 articles and reviews on TAVR from January 1, 2009, to August 1, 2023. Publication volume expanded from 35 in 2009 to a pinnacle in 2020, reflecting a near thirty folds increase, with citations escalating from 56 in 2009 to 27,354 in 2021. The United States prevailed in scholarly output (Np = 3,015), citation frequency (Nc = 70,991, excluding self-citations), and academic impact (H-index = 120). Columbia University was distinguished by the highest number of publications (Np = 380), citations (Nc = 41,051), and H-index (84). Within the author community, Rodes-Cabau J was preeminent, with 260 publications and an equivalent citation index and H-index. Keywords such as "balloon-expandable valve," "coronary access," "next-day discharge," "conducti on disturbances," and "coronary obstruction" have surfaced as the lexicon of burgeoning research themes. Conclusion: Investigation into TAVR has emerged as a major area of scholarly focus. The United States stands at the forefront of this research. Columbia University ranks as the preeminent institution in terms of publication output. Key research themes such as "balloon-expandable valve," "coronary access," and "coronary obstruction" are shaping up as current and prospective research hotspots, signaling potential areas for future study and innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.